It is, we should note, the internal coherence of culture through the complex reiterations of verbal experience that literature articulates, and not a response to the natural world or to history: "he real interest of myth is to draw a circumference around a human community and look inward toward that community, not to inquire into the operations of nature. It is myth, he argues, that marks the contours of a culture: "A mythology rooted in a specific society transmits a heritage of shared allusion and verbal experience in time, and so mythology helps to create cultural history" (34). His uncompromising conception of mythology as the very heart of literature is grounded here in an account of the Bible as the origin of what he repeatedly calls the "mythological universe" of Western literature.
Frye principal definition code#
The Great Code may well be the most deeply instructive of Northrop Frye's books, though the object of instruction is less the Bible itself than the nature and source of Frye's enterprise as a critic. In particular, his readings revive a form of Christian supersessionism that detaches the Hebrew Scriptures from the shifting complications of their densely particular realizations. His claims are questionable from the point of view of both literary theory and biblical scholarship, and they lead him systematically to misrepresent biblical texts.
Frye principal definition series#
The Bible, as a text in which metaphor and other kinds of figuration predominate, is just such a structure and, as such, has served as the origin of Western literature's "mythological universe." Arguing from this far-reaching claim, Frye offers a series of schemata that seek to explain the design and purpose of the Bible. According to Frye, a literary work is "a verbal structure existing for its own sake." It has a self-referential character.
A motion that is raised before or during trial, to exclude the presentation of unqualified evidence to the jury.Northrop Frye's first book on the Bible and literature, The Great Code, discloses more about the nature of Frye's literary criticism than it does about the Bible itself. 1923), a case discussing the admissibility of polygraph test as evidence. The term Frye motion comes from the case, Frye v. 1013, 1014 (1923), the court stated that expert opinion based on a scientific technique is inadmissible unless the technique is "generally accepted" as reliable in the relevant scientific community.įrye Motion Law and Legal Definition. Likewise, is the Frye standard still used? The Frye standard has been abandoned by many states and the federal courts in favor of the Daubert standard, but it is still law in some states.Ĭiting Frye v. It provides that expert opinion based on a scientific technique is admissible only where the technique is generally accepted as reliable in the relevant scientific community. Regarding this, why is Frye v United States important?ġ923) was a case that established the Frye standard, a test to determine the admissibility of scientific evidence.
1923) states that an expert opinion is admissible if the scientific technique on which the opinion is based is “generally accepted” as reliable in the relevant scientific community. Unlike the Daubert standard, the general premise in Frye v.
0 kommentar(er)
